
Ever wondered how much energy different hairstyles use? While some styles might take a few minutes and a single tool, other styles can involve an hour under heat, multiple appliances, and enough energy to boil a kettle three times over.
Well, wonder no more. The Energy Cut Index by Valda Energy ranks popular hairstyles by the amount of energy they typically require – so you can finally see what each styling routine actually uses.
Heat styling is part of many people’s everyday routine, especially hairdressers, but it can use more energy than you might expect.
Pick up a hairdryer and you’re running anywhere from 1,200 – 2,400 watts. Add straighteners, a curling wand or a hot brush, and your routine can quietly burn a significant amount of electricity.
The real variable isn’t the tool you use, though – it's how long it runs. Poker-straight tresses or a voluminous blowout might take 45 minutes of continuous heat. And different looks that seem relatively simple can sit at opposite ends of the energy spectrum if you break down the steps involved.
That contrast is exactly what the Energy Cut Index sets out to show, by comparing popular hairstyles based on their typical heat styling energy use.
This ranking compares popular hairstyles based on the typical energy required to create them, taking into account the heated tools used, styling time and how they are usually worn in real life. It reflects everyday routines rather than controlled lab conditions, giving a more realistic view of how energy is used across different looks.
Expand each option below to reveal which hairstyles require the most to least energy.
.png)
Energy use is calculated using typical tool wattage multiplied by average styling time for each look; see the methodology section below for full details.
“Getting married recently opened my eyes to how much goes into creating different hairstyles. It’s not just skill, there’s a surprising amount of energy and effort behind every look, something the Energy Cut Index helps put into perspective.”
Zoe Mortimer - HR Director
Your wedding hair might be the most photographed look of your life, but have you ever wondered how much energy goes into creating it?
We were feeling curious - and turns out, there’s a huge variation here too. From loose, effortless waves to a full traditional bridal blow dry, we took a focused look at popular bridal hairstyles by energy use.
So, if you’re planning a wedding, booked to do the styles, or simply curious about the impact behind the final result, our Energy Cut Index offers a new perspective on familiar styles, highlighting how different approaches to styling can vary in energy use.
.png)
The Half-up Half-down style with soft waves uses just 0.004 kWh per session, making it one of the most energy-efficient bridal options despite its polished, occasion-ready finish.
Hairdressers and salon professionals work with some of the most energy-intensive tools of any small business – and unlike a kettle or an oven, they’re often running back-to-back, all day.
The Energy Cut Index is not about limiting creativity or changing the services you offer. After all, style is down to client preference! Instead, it’s a way to better understand where energy use occurs.
Having a clearer view of where those energy-intensive moments happen can help you think more strategically about how you use equipment throughout the day. This could mean reviewing how time is allocated to certain styles, or simply becoming more aware of patterns in day-to-day operations.
Access to reliable data can also play a role here. Tools such as smart meters allow businesses like yours to track energy use in real time, helping to identify trends and manage costs more effectively without impacting the client experience.
The hairstyles included in the Energy Cut Index were selected based on cultural relevance, recognisability and current trends. This includes a mix of well-known iconic looks and styles influenced by recent social media and celebrity trends.
To estimate energy use, each hairstyle was broken down into the typical heated tools required to create the finished look. Average wattage for these tools was sourced from manufacturer specifications, while styling time was estimated using professional tutorial videos to reflect how each look is created in practice.
Energy consumption was then calculated in kilowatt-hours (kWh) by combining tool wattage with average usage time for each step in the styling process. Each hairstyle was scored on a scale of 1 to 100 based on its relative energy intensity and grouped into energy bands ranging from low to ultra-high.
The index is UK-focused and based on typical styling routines rather than controlled laboratory conditions. It is designed to reflect how hairstyles are commonly created in practice, using a consistent methodology across all styles to allow for a fair comparison.